Genetic Diversity and Nutritional Components Evaluation of Bangladeshi Germplasms of Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.

2 Grain Quality and Nutrition Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh.

3 On-farm Research Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Sylhet, Bangladesh.

4 Department of Agronomy, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.

Abstract

Considering the crucial focus on plant developments as high yielding, protein, and disease-resistant varieties, in this study, the genetic diversity and nutritional traits of available kidney bean germplasms found in Bangladesh have been evaluated based on seventeen quantitative and six nutritional traits. Analysis of genotypic, phenotypic variance and covariance showed that higher environmental influence was found in 1000-seed weight and seed yield/plant than other characters. High heritability was observed in dry weight (94.59%), leaf area (96.83%), days to 5 leaves stage (88.80%), number of leaves (87.38%) and number of pods per plant (87.32%), while high genetic advance was found in leaf area (59.46), 1000-seed weight (52.80), seed yield/plant (39.89). The genotypes were grouped in four clusters by diversity (D2) analysis where clusters I and III consisted of seven and one genotypes, respectively. Furthermore, highest inter and intracluster distance was found between Cluster I and Cluster III (23.742) and cluster IV (0.900) respectively. Principle component analysis revealed that days to 5- leaves stage, days to 1st flowering and days to 50% flowering were major characters contributing towards genetic diversity (74.8%) in Kidney bean. Analysis of nutritional traits showed that the germplasms of Sylhet region contained more carbohydrate (60.24-64.03%), fiber (2.08-2.46%) and ash (2.31-2.95%), whereas the germplasms of Bandarbanhad had more protein content (23.05-23.11%) than the released varieties used as control. In addition, the genotypes of the Sylhet region e.g. G6 (2.68t/ha), G5 (2.56 t/ha) and G4 (2.49 t/ha) showed maximum seed yield/ha. The results suggest that the germplasms of Sylhet and Bandarban could serve as valuable genetic resources to breed high yielding and super quality Kidney bean varieties.

Keywords

References

Ali M, Kushwaha BL. 1987. Cultivation of rabi rajmash in plains. Indian J 31(2): 20-23.
Angadi PK, Patil MG, Lokesha R, Hussain SA, Hanchinmani CN, Sreenivas AG. 2011. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Environ Ecol 29(4): 1922-1925.
AOAC. 1995. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
Baloch MS, Zubair M. 2010. Effect of nipping on growth and yield of chickpea. J Anim Pl Sci 20(3): 208-210.
Barelli MAA, Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, VidigalFilho PS, Amaral J, Antonio T, Poletine P. 2005. Characterization of landraces of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm from Mato Grosso do Sul State. Ann Rep Bean Improv Coop 48: 10-11.
Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, Loria CM, Whelton PK. 2003. Dietary fiber intake and reduced risk of coronary heart disease in US men and women: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Intern Med 163(16):1897-904.
Burton GW, Devane EM. 1953. Estimating heritability from replicated clonal material. Agron J 45: 478-481.
Chaudhary R, Sharma S. 2013. Conventional nutrients and antioxidants in red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris l.): an explorative and product development endeavor. Annals Food Sci Tech 14(2): 275- 285.
Cochran WG, Cox GM. 1957. Experimental design. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Dikshit HK, Gupta SR, Asthana AN. 1999. Genetic parameters and diversity in rajmash. Leg Res 22: 198-200.
Falconer DS. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 2nd Ed. London: Oliver and Boyd Edinburg, 164- 176.
FAOSTAT. 2017. Available at: www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
Govanakoppa RB, Hosamani RM, Salimath PM. 2002. Genetic diversity in French bean under moisture stress condition. Veg Sci 29(1): 37-39.
Hanson CH, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. 1956. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean lesedezo. Agron J 48: 268-272.
Hsieh HM, Pomeranz Y, Swanson BG. 1992. Composition, cooking time and maturation of Azuki (Vigna angularis) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Cereal Chem 69(3): 244-248.
Hussain MM. 2005. Yield and quality of Bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes as influenced by date of sowing. Unpublished MSc thesis. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh.
Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. 1955. Genotypic and phenotypic correlation in soyabean and their implication in selection. Agron J 45: 477-483.
Kamaluddin SA. 2011. Variability, correlation and path analysis for seed yield and yield related traits in common beans.  Indian J Hort 68(1): 56-60.
Khatoon N, Prakash J. 2004. Nutritional quality of microwave-cooked and pressure-cooked legumes. Intl J Food Sci Nutrition 55(6): 441-448.
Lush JL. 1949. Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animal. Heriditas 35: 256-261.
Mahalanobi PC. 1936. On the generalized distances in statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci India 2: 49-55.
Mather K. 1949. Biometrical Genetics: The study of continuous variation. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
McIntosh M, Miller C. 2001. A diet containing food rich in soluble and insoluble fiber improves glycemic control and reduces hyperlipidemia among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Rev 59(2):52-55.
Menotti A, Kromhout D, Blackburn H, Menotti A, Fidanza F, Buzina R, Nissinen A. 1999. Food intake patterns and 25-year mortality from coronary heart disease: cross-cultural correlations in the seven countries study. The Seven Countries Study Research Group. Eur J Epidemiol 15(6):507-15.
Murty, BR, Arunachalam V. 1966. The nature of genetic divergence in relation to breeding system in crop plants. Indian J Genet 26: 188-198.
Nadarajan N, Gunasekaran M. 2012. Quantitative genetics and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi. India: Kalyani.
Nandi, A, Tripathi P, Samal KM. (1996). Variability genetics in pole French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) mutant lines. ACIAR Food Legume Newsl 24: 7-8.
Nazrul MI, Shahed MR. 2016. Performance of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in Sylhet region of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agron J 19(1): 37-44.
Neupane RK, Shrestha R, Vaidya ML, Bhattarai EM, Darai R. 2008. Agromorphological diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces of Jumla, Nepal, pp. 639–648. In M.C. Kharkwal, (ed.). Proceedings of the Fourth International Food Legumes Research Conference. New Delhi, India.
Niveditha PD, Sudharani M, Rajesh AP. 2017. Genetic diversity for kernel yield and qualitative traits in peanut stem necrosis tolerant groundnut genotypes of Andhra Pradesh. E J Pl Breed 8(1): 390-394.
Noor F, Hossain F, Ara U. 2014. Screening of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for high yield potential. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res 49(4): 227-232.
Ofuya ZM and Akhidue V. 2005. The role of pulses in human nutrition: A review. J Appl Sci Env Manag 9(3): 99-104.
Omoigui LO, Ishiyaku MF, Kamara AY, Alabi SO, Sg M. 2006. Evaluation of cowpea accessions for the Southern Guinea savannah. Trop Sci 46: 227-232.
Padi KF, Edhlers DF. 2008. Effectiveness of early generation selection in cowpea for grain yield and agronomic characters in semi-arid West Africa. Crop Sci 48:533-540.
Patil JV, Mutker ML, Nimbalkar VS. 1993. Variability and character association in French bean. J Maharashtra Agril Univ 18: 76-78.
Prakash J, Ram RB, Meena ML. 2015. Genetic variation and characters interrelationship studies for quantitative and qualitative traits in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Lucknow conditions. Legume Res 38(4): 425-433.
Prakash J, Ram RB. 2014. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for seed yield and yield related traits in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Lucknow conditions. Intl J Innovative Sci Eng Tech 1(6): 41-50.
Raffi SA, Nath UK. 2004. Variability, heritability, genetic advance and relationships of yield and yield contributing characters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Biol Sci 4: 157-159.
Salunkhe DK, Sathe SK, Deshpande SS. 1989. French bean. CRC Handbook of World Food Legumes: Nutritional Chemistry, Processing Technology and Utilization. Salunkhe DK, Kadam SS, eds. Boca Raton. FL: CRC Press 2: 23.
Savitha, B.N. (2008). Characterization of Avare (Lablab purpureusL.Sweet) local collections for genetic variability. Unpublished MSc thesis. Dharwad, UAS.
Singh DN, Nandi A, Tripathy P 1994. Genetic variability and character association in French bean. Indian J Agri Sci 64 (2): 114-116.
Singh, D, Mishra, A.K. 2008. Studies on genetic divergence in pea (PisumsativumL.). Agric Sci Digest 28(1): 77-78.
Sureja, AK, Sharma RR. 2001. Genetic divergence in Garden Pea (PisumsativumL. subsp. hortenseAsch and Graebn). Veg Sci 28(1): 63-64.
Tuppad S, Shetty SG, Sandesh MS, Hadapad B, Souravi K, Rajasekharan PE. 2017. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield contributing characters in holostemma ada-kodien-a vulnerable medicinal plant. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6(12): 3795-3800.
USDA (National Nutrient Database). 2017. Cut green beans. Available at: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/
Zeven AC, Waninge J, Hintum TV, Singh SP. 1999. Phenotypic variation in a core collection of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the Netherlands. Euphytica 109: 93-106.
Journal of Genetic Resources
Volume 5, Issue 2
July 2019
Pages 83-96

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics