A Comparative Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Structure of Whooper Swan (Cygnus cygnus): A New Considerable Established Population in Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Environmental science, Biodiversity Branch, Natural resources faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

Abstract

New wintering populations of Whooper Swan have been recently reported from west Asia, a lack of information about the population and its origin. The understanding the genetic structure and connectivity are crucial for determining strategies of management for its conservation programs. The samples were collected from two populations in northern Iran, Finland, Sweden, and Iceland, where with large breeding populations and Poland, where it has started nesting recently. Total genomic DNA was isolated from fresh blood or feather samples and six microsatellites markers were chosen based on their level of polymorphism. The results indicated that the maximum and minimum of Allele richness were observed for Iranian (5.6) and Polish (3.44) populations respectively. The analysis of molecular variance revealed that 77 % and 23% of the total diversity belong to within and between populations, respectively. The 114 Whooper Swans from six populations were categorized into four gene pools. Structure analysis suggested that the Scandinavian populations (Finland, Sweden, and Iceland) were differentiated from the Poland population and from both the old and new Iranian populations. Generally, both populations from Iran have comprised maximum variety in terms of having different gene pool and it is likely that the new population of Iran (Feredonkenar), is composed of individuals that migrated from an old Iranian population (Guilan) to this area as well as some individuals from Scandinavian.

Keywords

References

Ahmadi AK, Rahimi G, Vafaei A, Sayyazadeh H. 2007. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in Pekin (Anas platyrhynchos) and Muscovy (Cairina moschata) duck populations. Int J Poult Sci 6(5): 378-382.
Amini H, Sehhatisabet ME. 2007. Wintering populations of Swans in Iran. Podoces 2(2): 113-121.
Anderson BJ, Akcakaya HR, Araujo MB., Fordham DA, Martinez-Meyer E. 2009. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. Proc Biol Sci 276: 1415-1420.
Arruga M, Hadjisterkotis E, Monteagudo L, Tejedor M. 2007. A comparative genetic study of two groups of chukar partridges (Alectoris chukar) from Cyprus and Argentina, using microsatellite analysis. Eur J Wildl Res 53(1): 47-51.
Brazil MA. 2003. The Whooper Swan. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.
Davis MB, Shaw RG. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292:673-679.
del Hoyo J, Collar NJ. 2014. HBW and bird life international illustrated checklist of the birds of the world 1: Non-passerines. In: Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. 1013 pages
Dudzik K, Polakowski M, Jankowiak L, Dobosz R, Bielak E, Albrycht M. 2012. Incestuous broods of the whooper swan cygnus cygnus in poland. Ornis svecica 22: 16-18.
Dudzik K, Wodarczyk R, Stanisaw C, Polakowski M, Dudzik K. 2015. Unusual migratory behaviour in a newly established subpopulation of Whooper Swan (Cygnus cygnus) breeding in the highlands of Poland.  Ornis Fennica 92(4): 204-212.  
Earl DA, von Holdt BM. 2011. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output andimplementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4(2): 359-361.
Hughes, L. 2000: Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evolut 15: 56-61.
John JS, Ransler FA, Quinn TW, Oyler‐mccance SJ. 2006. Characterization of microsatellite loci isolated in trumpeter swan (Cygnus buccinator). Mol Ecol Notes 6(4): 1083-1085.
McCarty JP. 2001. Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conservation Biology 15(2): 320-331.
Nilsson L. 1997. Changes in numbers and habitat utilization of wintering Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus in Sweden 1964-1997. Ornis svecica 7(3): 133-142.
Oyler-McCance SJ, Ransler FA, Berkman LK, Quinn TW. 2007. A rangewide population genetic study of trumpeter swans. Conserv Genet 8(6): 1339-1353.
Palsbøll PJ, Berube M, Allendorf FW. 2006. Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol Evolut 22: 12-16.
Parmesan C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637-669.
Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012: GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel: population genetic software for teaching and research- an update. Bioinformatics 28(19): 2537-2539.
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2): 945-959.
Ransler FA, Quinn TW, Oyler-McCance SJ. 2011. Genetic consequences of trumpeter swan (Cygnus buccinator) reintroductions. Conserv Genet 12(1): 257-268.
Roshier DA, Heinsohn R, Adcock GJ, Beerli P, Joseph L. 2012. Biogeographic models of gene flow in two waterfowl of the Australo‐Papuan tropics. Ecol Evol 2(11): 2803-2814.
Schtickzelle N, Choutt J, Goffart P, Fichefet V, Baguette M. 2005. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe. Biol Conserv 126: 569-581.
Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. 2008. ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24(21): 2498-2504.
Walther GR, Burga CA, Edwards PJ. 2001. Fingerprints of climate change: adapted behaviour and shifting species ranges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York
Wilson L. 2013. Differentiation of the Tundra (Cygnus columbianus columbianus) and trumpeter (Cygnus buccinator) swans and their hybrids using microsatellite regions. Online published MSc thesis, George Mason University, USA
Woodward FI. 1987. Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Journal of Genetic Resources
Volume 5, Issue 1
March 2019
Pages 51-58

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics